In October of 2003 China became the third country to place a man in the space with proper ways. The fact after happened forty and two years the first man? the Russian Iuri Gagarin? to have flied to the space. Forty and two years before also the first North American astronaut? Alan Shepard? he had flied to the space. Before China countries as the Tchecoslovquia dead person, Germany, Cuba, Vietnam, Monglia, Romnia, Afeganisto, France, Italy, Syrian, Switzerland, Japan, India, Canada, Spain, among others, already had sent men to the space, but always of hitchhiking in ships of Russia or United States (SAGAN, 1996; WALNUT, 2005; SPACEFACTS, 2010a and 2010g). In the truth, China was the thirty fifth country to send a man to the space.
Its great differential was to have developed a rocket powerful the sufficient to send to the space a ship manned with proper technology (SPACEFACTS, 2010a). The fact to have entered in the select club of nations capable to send men to the space constituted a status symbol indeed favorable and attracted the eyes of the world to the China in positive way. Some countries had immediately passed to consider the country as being a potential partner for future space activities. Before exactly to send men to the space China already if had established as a space power, therefore it is fixed as one of the developed nations more in the launching of commercial satellites, sending to the space loads of made use countries to pay for launchings with its rockets Long March to them, currently enters most efficient of the world. The decision to create a manned space program was only one waited consequncia already for a nation that possesss capacity for such and desire to show to the world what it is capable to obtain with its effort.
Social History is characterized as an approach with the anthropology. This interchange with social sciences made possible to history a magnifying of the thematic ones in the historiografia, thus, to observe it emergency of the history of the family, the ages, the sexuality, the symbolic one, the religious representations, and other diverse subjects of the area of social sciences. One of the antropolgicas perspectives that established interchange with history was the Anthropology Interpretativa de Clifford Geertz. Geertz considered that the culture was inherent to the human being and that the same one determined all the social action, ademais pondered that the cultures could be analogous chores as texts or the texts. The description dense, that Geertz takes loaned by Ryle, its object of study will also be used by history when interpreting. The dense description is based on the contextual analysis where determined event it occurs, so that ' ' piscadelas' ' they are not confused with ' ' tiques nervosos' ' . Of this form, as Fernando Hisses, the historians when using the dense description more would be worried in constructing an interpretation of an event of what to know on the occurred fact. Thus, with the magnifying of the methods, boardings, objects and sources; the daily one of Agns as historical source is not less verdica for being a subjective story and one ' ' document ordinrio' '.
However, it is important to consider that the interpretation on the story of Humbert represents a reading ' ' secondhand ' ' , from the interpretations that the author made on the events that she lived deeply. The interpretation is only a perspective, a construction that somebody imagines, exactly that if describes densely something, description does not represent this something. The experience of Agns represents, thus, a version, enters the different meanings attributed to the French Resistance. This multiple symbology, not present in the book analyzed and nor in the mind of the author (therefore the same one was next to symbols of what of others), mentions the general context to it that were the Resistance, therefore as the daily one of Agns informs in them, had some groups that if had opposed to the system politician of busy France.
The German process of industrialization were a process fast that was stimulated by specific objectives of the German State. Not being characterized for economic liberalism and yes for state protectionism, it allowed the conduction of the process in the direction to supply interests of the German nation (represented in the Reich). Added to this, entering direct of the call ‘ ‘ second revolution industrial’ ‘ , it allows to compete in equal conditions with its main competitors who also were only arriving at that moment at the industry dp steel, of the electricity and chemistry. The internal politics, with the existence of social democrats, socialist and communist, compelled Germany is to give important steps in the condition of social equalities and the paper centraliser of the State in the conduction of the economic policy approaches in them of that Germany is the embryo of the Welfare State (Been of welfare state) and of the interventionist state teorizado later for Keynes in its book ‘ ‘ General theory of the Job, the Interest and the Dinheiro.’ ‘ With the defeats in the two Great Wars, the German State and its industry were sufficiently weakened, however the success of the industrial politics was size that allowed the reerguimento of the power later. Today Germany is the great industrial power of the Europe, with advantage on English, Frenchmen and Italians, being the Valley of the 10 Ruhr the main European industrial polar region until the current days.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES: BRAGA, Jose Carlos de Souza. Germany: empire, barbarity and advanced capitalism. In: FIORI, Jose Luis (org). States and currencies in the development of the nations. Petrpolis, RIO DE JANEIRO: Ed. Voices, 1999 JASMIN, Maria Lucia de Castro.
The formation of the world contemporary. KEMP, Tone the industrial revolution in the Europe of century XIX. Lisbon: Editions 70, 1985 MORAES, Landmarks Ribeiro de Moraes.